Master of Management for Engineers

Question: Discuss about theMaster of Management for Engineers. Answer: Introduction: Organizational development in the public sector requires strategic change in initiatives (Marshak Bushe, 2013). Majority of the time change in public sector are referred to change in the legislation or change in the policies, top management replacement, technological change or breaking up of the public agencies. Thus, it actually requires large-scale strategic change so that it can able to regain agreement between organizational goals effectively. The article has also mentioned the significance of implementing management change in the public sector in order to fulfill all the requirements effectively. The Objective of the Article: The article focuses on describe the concept of organizational development of a public organization at Netherlands. The article will also focuses on the evaluation of traditional procedures in order to assess the significance of implementing change in the organizational development process. The article also focuses on highlighting the significance of organizational expansion procedures within the conventionally moderate lead communal segment organization at Netherland. It highlighted the fact that organization needs to utilize top down and bottom up goals technique in order to counter with the explicitly in an appropriate manner. The Methodology and Means of Analysis used in the Article: The article focuses on the effective utilization of project design model in order to investigate and track the utilization of ViZieR through time. The article has maintained a process approach that can be adopted to explain the course of outcomes. The implemented process has a sequence of events that include systematic implementation of procedures. Firstly, the purpose of ViZieR project has to be evaluated in an appropriate manner (Cummings Worley, 2014). Secondly, it will focuses on the coding of these events in a proper way. The ViZieR project has implement new OD change method in the UWV organization with the present practices of strategic management. In fact, the project has tried to provide completely new way for implementing change in the process (Coghlan Shani, 2014). The Argument Advanced in the Article: The article highlighted that another organization focuses on the utilization of restricted procedures in order to maintain administrative functions in a distinctive manner. The article have mentioned organization have to focus on the definite approach in order to fulfill all the requirements of the transition procedure effectively. Thus, the organization will have to focus on the utilization of the challenges on a quickly basis so that it cannot able to create any adverse impact on the delay process (Bartunek Woodman, 2015). However, the article also have mentioned that the implemented methodology has to focus on the utilization of specific modification on the on the agendas through which it can able to create positive impact on the level of trust, certainty and responsibility level of the organization (Bartunek Woodman, 2015). The argument of the article has mentioned that procedural change approach can be implemented in different ways. However, it effectiveness depends on the way of implementation of the procedure. Findings: The findings of the article have highlighted the fact that bottom-up approach can be regarded with the same importance like the top-down approach of strategic management. It also has mentioned that bottom-up approach can actually provide a new way for effectively implement organizational development plan (DiBella, 2014). The article has also identified that management of the organization have to play a critical role in utilizing any types of approach. Otherwise, it might not able to create desired amount of impact on the procedural change process. Conclusion: Form the analysis of the article, it can be concluded that organizations have to focus on the proper utilization of top management in order to implement organizational development effectively. The top management have to play a critical role so that all the employees can able to adjust with the implemented organizational development technique. However, the impact of organizational development will have to assess based on the fulfilment of the objectives. Managerial Implication: The article has highlighted that top management have to perform their roles and responsibilities in such a way so that it can able to create positive impact on the organizational development (Bartunek Woodman, 2015). In case of top-down approach, managers will have to develop strategies in such a way so that it can able to implement change in the operational process of the organization. In case of bottom-up approach, management have to focus on the evaluation of different perspectives of employees so that it can able to create best possible impact on the organizational development process (Bartunek Woodman, 2015). Strengths: The strengths of the article are discussed as follows: The prime strength of the article is that it has able to provide an in-depth analysis over the concept of organizational development concerning an organization that will help readers to evaluate the importance of the topic. The article has also depict the significance of proper utilization of top management in order to counter the adverse internal impact of organizational development The article have also depict the way organization can create positive impact on the profit level by utilizing organizational development procedures Weaknesses: The limitations of the article are as follows: The article has not focuses on providing data with respect to the topic. In fact, it has tried to develop hypothetical argument for analyzing concept of organizational development. The article has not focuses on providing proper definition to the concept of organizational development. For that reason, the article has not able to highlight proper significance of the topic. The article also has not included any data analysis technique like sampling method or survey interview for evaluating the importance of the topic. References: Bartunek, J. M., Woodman, R. W. (2015). Beyond Lewin: toward a temporal approximation of organization development and change. Burke, W. W., Noumair, D. A. (2015).Organization development: A process of learning and changing. FT Press. Burnes, B., Cooke, B. (2012). Review article: The past, present and future of organization development: Taking the long view.Human Relations,65(11), 1395-1429. Bushe, G. R., Marshak, R. J. (2014). Dialogic organization development.The NTL handbook of organization development and change, 193-211. Coghlan, D., Shani, A. B. (2014). Creating action research quality in organization development: Rigorous, reflective and relevant.Systemic Practice and Action Research,27(6), 523-536. Cummings, T. G., Worley, C. G. (2014).Organization development and change. Cengage learning. DiBella, A. J. (2014). Learning Systems and Organization Development.The NTL Handbook of Organization Development and Change, 625-640. Marshak, R. J., Bushe, G. R. (2013). An introduction to advances in dialogic organization development.OD Practitioner,45(1), 1-4.